IGetPMS2 - Here are Governor Dean's thoughts on Tax Reform (you seemed concerned about his plan).

Search

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/cg/index.html?type=page&pagename=policy_statement_economy_taxreform

Financed by federal deficits and by shifting the burdens to states and localities, the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts benefited the wealthiest Americans while doing little or nothing for the middle class. In fact, the Bush tax policies furthered the administration’s goal of shifting the federal tax burden from income derived from invested wealth to the shoulders of working Americans. For many Americans, increases in state and local taxes, cuts in services, and falling incomes outweighed any modest decrease in their federal tax rate. The tax cuts are part of the long- term Republican agenda to starve the federal government of the resources it needs to meet our commitments to public education, Social Security and Medicare.

The first step in reversing this agenda, balancing the budget and putting the US fiscal house in order must be the repeal of the Bush tax cuts, and returning the tax code to rates that were in effect during the prosperous years of the Clinton-Gore administration.

The distribution of the income tax burden has changed dramatically. In 1973, corporations paid 40% of federal income tax revenues. Last year, the corporate contribution was down to 16.8%. Experts estimate that corporate tax avoidance schemes are costing the US taxpayers up to $100 billion a year. Senator John McCain claims that even a modest effort to eliminate unnecessary special interest tax preferences and loopholes would raise nearly $50 billion a year in increased federal revenues.

The current tax code is overloaded with special interest favoritism and stacked against working Americans. Unfair tax subsidies, shelters and loopholes abound. Corporations use foreign tax havens solely to avoid paying US income taxes. Tax cheats escape detection and prosecution. Abusive tax shelters are commonplace.

Governor Dean will make fundamental reform of the tax system one of his first priorities. He will crack down on tax shelter promoters and their clients He will pursue actions to impose hefty fines and bar further practice before government agencies by lawyers and accountants who certify abusive tax shelters. President Bush’s own tax commissioner testified that the IRS lacked sufficient resources to collect $30 billion in known unpaid taxes. The Governor will provide the Internal Revenue Service with the budget it needs to do its job.

The Dean economic program will strive for greater tax fairness for middle class working families. Closing corporate tax loopholes will help shift some of the burden off the shoulders of individuals. Ending unfair tax preferences will raise additional revenue to reduce the deficit and help set the federal budget on the road to balance.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,146
Tokens
Lander,

Please give us all an example in the past 50 years where a tax increase led to an improved economy.

"Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man." - The Dude, 1998
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
Floyd,
It seems that you've misinterpereted the post yet again. First, I'm quite certain that this thread was clearly directed to IgetPMS2, not towards Floyd "the Grenich Village queen bee". Secondly, and more importantly - these views are specifically the views of Howard Dean. I posted them to IgetPMS2 because he suggested that Governor Dean would not answer a question based on Bush's tax plan, but that is most certainly not the case as you can read (had you actually chosen to).

For the record - I am not a Governor Dean fan.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Reagan put in a tax increase in 1984 and it led to prosperity until it was undone by the 1986 tax code rewrite which was bandied about as a tax cut. Bush I and Clinton put in tax increases and they didn't get in the way of prosperity in the 90s. You can't judge tax cuts or increases in terms of less than a couple years. Bottom line though is tax cuts and increases are just a lot of window dressing. Saying you get this or he gets that is voter friendly, but not very effective. Tax take is what matters, how much of a burden the tax takes as a % of GDP. These can only be measured well after the period is over.

I will say I am not terribly fond of the Dean platform and I think it is very disingenious of him and all the other candidates to make a big stink about the tax cuts when they want to raise taxes simply to pay for their pet projects. When will one of these guys say I am for some rollback of tax cuts simply to get our house in order???
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,178
Messages
13,564,985
Members
100,754
Latest member
itsdbarone
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com